تأثیر تیمار آنزیمی ترانس‌گلوتامیناز بر ویژگی‌های فیزیکوشیمیایی و میکروبی ماست سویای سین‌بیوتیک

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم و صنایع غذایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

2 دانشگاه پیام نور مشهد

چکیده

در سالهای اخیر استفاده از محصولات سویا به‌دلیل آگاهی مصرف‌کنندگان در مورد فواید سویا به‌طور روزافزونی افزایش یافته است. ماست پروبیوتیک سویا به‌دلیل داشتن ترکیبات فراسودمندی همچون میکروارگانیسم‌های پروبیوتیک و پری‌بیوتیک‌ها‌ی طبیعی (رافینوز، استاکیوز)، از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است و جزء فرآورده‌های سین‌بیوتیک در نظر گرفته می‌شود. هدف از انجام این پژوهش، بررسی تأثیر مقادیر مختلف آنزیم TG (0، 015/0، 03/0و 045/0 درصد) و اینولین (0، 1 و 2 درصد) بر ویژگی‌های فیزیکوشیمیایی و میکروبی ماست سویای سین‌بیوتیک طی مدت 21 روز نگهداری در یخچال بود. در تولید ماست سویای سین‌بیوتیک، از لاکتوباسیلوس اسیدوفیلوس La-5 و بیفیدوباکتریوم لاکتیس Bb-12 به‌عنوان باکتری‌های پروبیوتیک استفاده گردید. یافته‌ها نشان داد با افزایش غلظت آنزیم، مقدار اسیدیته و سینرزیس کاهش و میزان pH به‌طور معنی‌داری (001/0p <) افزایش یافت؛ درحالی‌که تأثیر معنی‌داری بر ماده خشک مشاهده نشد. همچنین افزایش غلظت اینولین به‌طور معنی‌داری باعث افزایش اسیدیته، ماده خشک و کاهش pH و سینرزیس نمونه‌ها‌ی ماست گردید(001/0p <). با گذشت زمان نگهداری مقدار pH و سینرزیس به‌طور معنی‌داری کاهش و میزان اسیدیته تا روز چهاردهم افزایش و پس از آن کاهش یافت (001/0p <). این درحالی است که تغییر معنی‌داری در میزان ماده خشک مشاهده نشد. بررسی رنگ محصول با دستگاه رنگ‌سنج نشان داد که تمام متغیرهای مورد بررسی شامل غلظت آنزیم، اینولین و مدت زمان نگهداری اثر معنی‌داری بر پارامتر‌های روشنایی (L*)، قرمزی (a*) و زردی (b*) گذاشتند (001/0p <). همچنین به‌طور کلی با افزایش غلظت آنزیم و زمان نگهداری تعداد شمارش کلی پروبیوتیک‌ها کاهش و با افزایش غلظت اینولین تعداد آن‌ها افزایش یافت (01/0p <). درهرحال، تعداد باکتری‌های پروبیوتیک در تمامی نمونه‌های ماست سویای سین‌بیوتیک طی مدت 21 روز نگهداری بالاتر از cfu/g 107 تعیین گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of transglutaminase enzyme treatment on the physicochemical and microbial properties of synbiotic soy yogurt

نویسندگان [English]

  • Khadijeh Ababaf 1
  • Hossein Jooyandeh 1
  • Behzad Nasehi 2
1 Department of Food Science and Technology, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Ahvaz, Iran
2 payame noor university
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The word “probiotic” comes from the Greek word “pro bios” meaning “for life”, which is the opposed of the term “antibiotics” meaning “against life.” Probiotics are alive bacteria and the majority of probiotic microorganisms are belonging to the genera of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Regular consumption of probiotics in the adequate amounts have many beneficial health such as prevention of diarrhea, constipation, intestinal diseases and help to digest lactose and strengthen the immune system. On the other hand, recently the use of soy products has been progressively increased due to consumer consciousness about soy benefits. Soy probiotic yogurt is of special importance due to the presence of functional compounds such as probiotic microorganisms and natural prebiotics (raffinose, stachyose), the combination which is considered and dubbed as synbiotic. Dairy products, especially probiotic yogurt, are the most common foods that are used as probiotic products. On the other hand, yogurt production and similar products have always been accompanied with problems such as defects in texture, structure and syneresis. The functionality and structure of proteins can be modified with physical, chemical and enzymatic procedures. Enzymatic modification has been recommended as a useful technique owing to high specificity of enzymatic reactions and therefore a little risk of formation of toxic products. Transglutaminase enzyme can produce a gel with a desirable structure by forming covalent bonds between glutamine and lysine in protein systems. Therefore, the effect of application of transglutaminase enzyme in protein food systems (such as milk, yogurt, cheese, ice cream, bread, fish, meat and other food products) have been extensively studied by many researchers. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical and microbial properties of symbiotic soy yogurt as affected by TG-enzymatic treatment at different inulin concentrations.
Materials and methods: The effect of different amounts of TG-enzyme (0, 0.015, 0.03 and 0.045%) and inulin (0, 1 and 2%) on physicochemical (pH, acidity, syneresis) and microbial characteristics (probiotic count) of synbiotic soy yogurt during 21 days of cold storage (1, 7, 14 and 21 days) was investigated. To prepare the synbiotic soy yoghurt samples, inulin as a prebiotic and Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis as probiotic bacteria were used and added to the soy milk. After addition of inulin, soy milk was heated (95 °C for 5 min) and cooled to inoculation temperature (45 °C). After the enzyme addition, the probiotic starter culture was added and fermentation was done at 42 °C until the pH was reached to 4.6. Sample without TG-enzyme and inulin was considered as control yogurt. For performing analysis, data were analyzed by a completely randomized factorial design using SPSS software, version 24. The mean of treatments was compared with Duncan test at 95% confidence level.
Results and discussion: The results showed that with increasing the enzyme concentration, amount of acidity and syneresis decreased while pH increased significantly (p < 0.001). This was probably due to formation of internal and interstitial bonds in protein network which causes reduction of bioavailability of organic compounds for microorganisms (reduce acidity) and increases water holding capacity (reduce syneresis). However, enzymatic treatment had no significant effect on total solids of the samples. Increasing the amount of inulin also caused a significant increase in acidity and total solids while expressively reduced pH and syneresis of yoghurt samples (p < 0.001). The reduction of syneresis as a consequence of inulin addition was probably due to water absorption and water holding capacity of this compound. The highest total solids was recorded for yogurt sample containing 2 percent inulin and the lowest was recorded for control (0 percent inulin). By passing the time of storage, pH and syneresis significantly decreased and acidity until the fourteenth day increased and thereafter decreased considerably (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant effect on the amount total solids. The results of microbial analysis showed that with increasing enzyme concentration, the survival amount of Bifidobacterium lactis decreased significantly (p < 0/01). Although their number in the sample containing the highest level of enzyme was higher than standard. The formation of covalent bonds due to the addition of the TG enzyme can remove lower the molecular weight of peptides from the available microorganisms and thus reduce their growth. On the other hand, by increasing the enzyme concentration, unlike Bifidobacterium, the survival rate of Lactobacillus acidophilus increased significantly compared to the control sample, but eventually the amount was lower than the standard. By increasing the inulin concentration at level 2% the growth rate of Bifidobacterium lactis was significantly increased (p < 0/01). The effect of storage period on the survival rate of Bifidobacterium showed that during storage, their number decreased significantly (p < 0/05). However, the number of probiotic bacteria in all soy synbiotic yogurts at the end of 21-day maintenance were over 107 logcfu/g. Our results also showed significant interactions between three tested variables on the physicochemical characteristics and the probiotic counts.
Conclusion: In general, the results of this study showed that the addition of enzyme and inulin during storage period did not have an adverse effect on pH and acidity and also reduced the syneresis. The sample containing 0.045% enzyme and 2% inulin at the end of the storage period showed the least syneresis compared to the control sample. In this study, amongst two probiotic bacteria, Bifidobacterium lactis, in comparison with Lactobacillus acidophilus, was able to maintain its survival rate above the standard level. Among the different samples, the sample containing 2% inulin on the first day of storage period had the highest probiotic content. According to the results, the best synbiotic soy yogurt with acceptable probiotic count and physicochemical properties could be produced using 2% inulin and 0.015% TG-enzyme concentration.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Transglutaminase enzyme
  • Soy yogurt
  • Inulin
  • Probiotic
  • Functional products
جوینده ح، رستم­آبادی ح، و گودرزی م، 1398. بررسی اثر به­کارگیری موسیلاژ دانه­های اسفرزه، شاهی و ریحان بر رفتار رئولوژیکی دسر لبنی شکلاتی کم­چرب. نشریه پژوهش­های صنایع غذایی، 29(1): 98-83.
جوینده ح، محمودی ر، سمواتی و و حجتی م، 1394. تأثیر تیمار آنزیمی سرد ترانس‌گلوتامیناز شیر بر ویژگی‌های بافت ماست. علوم و صنایع غذایی، 1 (13): 99-91.
رضایی ر، خمیری م، اعلمی م و کاشانی نژاد م، 1392. بررسی اثر اینولین بر خواص فیزیکوشیمیایی، رئولوژیکی، حسی و زنده­مانی پروبیوتیک­ها در ماست منجمد. علوم و صنایع غذایی، 41(10): 90-81.
عظیمی محله ا، زمردی ش، محمدی ثانی ع و احمدزاده قوی­دل ر، 1391. بررسی تأثیر فیبر پرتقال بر خواص فیزیکوشیمیایی، رئولوژیکی و حسی ماست میوه­ای توت فرنگی به روش سطح پاسخ. مجله نوآوری در علوم و فناوری غذایی، 1: 33-24.
موسسه استاندارد و تحقیقات صنعتی ایران، 1385. استاندارد ملی ایران شماره 2852، شیر و فرآورده‌های آن، تعیین اسیدیته و pH- روش آزمون
نیکبخت کشکولی ت، جوینده ح، تهموزی دیده‌بان  و، و سمواتی و، 1396. بهینه‌یابی فرآیند تولید داهی سین‌بیوتیک حاوی لاکتوباسیلوس اسیدوفیلوس، کتیرا و اینولین به روش سطح پاسخ (RSM). علوم و صنایع غذایی، 62 (14): 103-89.
یدملت م، جوینده ح و حجتی م، 1396. تأثیر صمغ فارسی و صمغ دانه بالنگو شیرازی بر ویژگی­های بافتی ماست همزده کم­چرب. نشریه پژوهش­های صنایع غذایی، 27(4): 181-171.
Akın MB, Akın MS and Kırmacı Z, 2007. Effects of inulin and sugar levels on the viability of yogurt and probiotic bacteria and the physical and sensory characteristics in probiotic ice-cream. Food Chemistry 104(1): 93-99.
AOAC, 2002. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
Aryana KJ and Mcgrew P, 2007. Quality attributes of yogurt with lactobacillus and various prebiotics. LWT-Food Science and Technology 40: 1808-1814.
Boeni S and Pourahmad R, 2012. Use of inulin and probiotic lactobacilli in synbiotic yogurt production. Animal of Biological Research 3(7): 3486-3491.
Capela P, Hay TKC and Shah NP, 2006. Effect of cryoprotectants, prebiotics and microencapsulation on survival of probiotic organisms in yogurt and freeze-dried yogurt. Food Research International 39: 203–211.
Faergemand M and Qvist KB, 1997. Transglutaminase: effect on rheological properties, microstructure and permeability of set style acid skim milk gel. Food Hydrocolloid 11: 287–292.
Farnworth JP, Lia J, Hendricks GM and Guo MR, 2006. Effects of transglutaminase treatment on functional properties and probiotic culture survivability of goat milk yogurt. Small Ruminant Research 65: 113-121.
Gibson GR and Roberfroid MB, 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. The Journal of Nutrition 125(6): 1401-1412.
Guarner F, Khan AG, Garisch J, Eliakim R, Gangl A, Thomson A, Krabshuis J, Lemair T, Kaufmann P, De Paula JA and Fedorak R, 2012. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines. Journal of ClinicalGastroenterology 46(6): 468-481.
Guven M, Yasar K, Karaca O and Hayaloglu A, 2005. The effect of inulin as a fat replacer on the quality of set‐type low‐fat yogurt manufacture. International Journal of Dairy Technology 58: 180-184.
Jai JM, 1990. Modern Food Microbiology.Chapman and Hall.
Jooyandeh H, Mortazavi SA, Farhang P and Samavati V, 2015. Physicochemical Properties of Set-Style Yoghurt as Effect by Microbial Transglutaminase and Milk Solids Contents. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences 4(11)59-67.
Lollo PCB, de Moura CS, Morato PN, Cruz AG and Castro WF, 2013. Corrigendum to “Probiotic yogurt offers higher immune-protection than probiotic whey beverage. Food Research International 54: 923.
Lucey JA, 2004. Cultured dairy products: An overview of their gelation and texture properties. International Journal of Dairy Technology 57: 77-84.
Mazloomi S, Shekarforoush S, Ebrahimnejad H and Sajedianfard J, 2011. Effect of adding inulin on microbial and physico-chemical properties of low fat probiotic yogurt. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research 12: 93-98.
Moon, JH and Hong YH, 2003. Electron microscopic property of transglutaminase added milk. Korean Journal Food Science Animal Research 23 (4): 350-355.
Mortazavian AM, Ehsani MR, Mousavi SM, Reinheimer JA, Emamjomeh Z, Sohrabvandi S and Rezaei K, 2006. Preliminary investigation of the combined effect of heat treatment and incubation temperature on the viability of the probiotic microorganisms in freshly made yogurt. International Journal of Dairy Technology 59: 8-11.
Motoki M and Seguro K, 1998. Transglutaminase and its use for food processing. Trends in Food Science and Technology 9: 204-210.
Ramchandran L and Shah NP, 2010. Characterization of functional, biochemical and textural properties of symbiotic low-fat yogurts during refrigerated storage. LWT- Food Science and Technology 43: 819–827.
Rinaldoni AN, Campderros ME and Padilla AP, 2012. Physico-chemical and sensory properties of yogurt from ultra filtreted soy milk concentrate added with inulin. LWT-Food Science and Technology 45: 142-147.
Schorsch C, Carrie H, Clark AH and Norton IT, 2000. Cross-linking casein micelles by microbial transglutaminase conditions for formation of transglutaminase-induced gels. International Dairy Journal 10: 519–528.
Tinson W, Broome MC, Hillier AJ and Jago GR, 1982. Metabolism of Streptococcus thermophilus. 2. Production of CO2 and NH3 from urea. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 37: 14–16.
Violeta N, Ion T and Mira EI, 2010. HPLC Organic Acid Analysis in Different Citrus Juices under Reversed Phase Conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti AgrobotaniciCluj-Napoca 6: 44-48.
You HJ, Oh DK and Ji GE, 2004. Anticancerogenic effect of a novel Chiroinositol-containing polysaccharide from Bifidobacterium bifidum BNG. Microbiology Letters 240(2): 131-136.