بهینه‌سازی تولید بیوکامپوزیت نشاسته ترموپلاستیک با پرکننده سلولز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای علوم و صنایع غذایی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی‌واحد کرمانشاه

2 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، , واحد کرمانشاه. عضو هیات علمی

3 گروه پژوهشی بسته‌بندی و صنایع سلولزی، پژوهشکده شیمی‌و پتروشیمی، پژوهشگاه استاندارد، کرج

10.22034/fr.2021.41207.1755

چکیده

مقدمه: مشکل عمده دانشگاه و صنعت آلودگی پلاستیک‌ها به ویژه با کاربرد بسته‌بندی ست. بیوکامپوزیت زیست‌ تخریب‌پذیر نشاسته به دلیل قیمت پایین، فراوانی و زیست‌تخریب‌پذیری جایگزین مناسبی برای نشاسته است. هدف: در این پژوهش با استفاده از نشاسته ذرت و تقویت‌کننده‌ طبیعی سلولز از 0 تا 20 درصد و نسبت‌های مختلف نرم‌کننده گلیسرول/سوربیتول از 10 تا 20 درصد به روش اختلاط مذاب با اکسترودر دو مارپیچ ورق‌های مختلف نشاسته تولید گردید. روش کار: در این مطالعه تأثیر سلولز به عنوان یک عامل تقویت‌کننده و نسبت‌های متفاوت گلیسرول/سوربیتول به عنوان نرم‌کننده برای بهبود خواص در بیوکامپوزیت نشاسته مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نقطه بهینه بیوکامپوزیت نشاسته توسط نرم‌افزار دیزاین اکسپرت بدست آمد و آزمون‌های ساختاری XRD، TGA بر روی نمونه بهینه انجام شد. نتایج: نقطه بهینه تیمار با 5 درصد سلولز و درصد 5/17 از هرکدام از نرم‌کننده‌ها بود که نفوذپذیری به بخارآب معادل10-10×81/7 gs-1m-1Pa-1، استحکام کششی 85/0 مگاپاسکال، مدول یانگ 56/377 مگاپاسکال و افزایش طول تا نقطه شکست 08/7 درصد داشت. دمای انتقال شیشه‌ای بیوکامپوزیت نشاسته بهینه به حدود 130 درجه سانتیگراد افزایش یافت. اگرچه XRD بیوکامپوزیت بهینه پیک‌های تیزی مبنی بر وجود کریستال‌هایی را نشان داد، ولی نتایج وزن‌سنجی حرارتی نشان داد که بیوکامپوزیت بهینه در حدود 300 تجزیه می‌شود با توجه به دمای تجزیه نشاسته طبیعی که 220 درجه سانتیگراد است، مقاومت حرارتی آن را می‌توان به وجود سلولز در ساختارش نسبت داد. نتیجه‌گیری نهایی: نتیجه‌گیری می‌شود که تیمار با %5 سلولز و % 5/17 گلیسرول و % 5/17 سوربیتول (تیمار شماره 11) به‌عنوان یک نقطه بهینه این مدل در نظر گرفته می‌شود. با در نظرگیری نقطه بهینه در این تحقیق، به نظر می‌رسد که سلولز، گلیسرول و سوربیتول اثرات مثبتی بروی صفات بیوکامپوزیت نشاسته دارند. نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش می-تواند دریچه جدیدی به‌سوی استفاده از بسته‌بندی‌های زیست‌تخریب‌پذیر در صنایع غذایی جهت بهبود کیفیت و ایمنی مواد غذایی و کاهش زباله‌های حاصل از غذا بگشاید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Optimizing the Production of Thermoplastic Starch using Cellulose Filler

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mostafa Shahmaleki 1
  • Faranak Beigmohammadi 2
  • ّFarnaz Movahedi 3
1 PhD. Student of Food Science and Industry, Azad University, Kermanshah Branch.
2 Islmic Azad University, Kermanshah, Branch. ّFaculty Member
3 Research Team of Packaging and Cellulose Industry, Chemistry and Petrochemical Institute, Standard Research Institute, Karaj
چکیده [English]

Background: Plastic contamination, especially in packaging application, has been the main issue for universities and industry. Bio-composite of biodegradable Starch is considered as an appropriate replacement for starch due to low price, availability and biodegradability.
The film or coating is placed on the food as an integrated and thin layer of different polymer compounds. Today, contaminants from synthetic polymers have drawn attention to the use of biodegradable materials, and over the past two decades, the study of biodegradable materials derived from proteins and carbohydrates has expanded. These macromolecules could potentially be a viable alternative to synthetic polymers derived from petroleum products.
Goal: In the present study, different starch films have been produced by corn starch and natural cellulose booster from 0% to 20% applying melt mixing with twin extruder. The aim of this study is to obtain a suitable combination of starch with cellulose (natural and degradable) that makes starch similar to synthetic polymers with low water permeability and high mechanical strength and can be a good alternative for them. In addition, food additives such as citric acid and stearic acid are used in a constant amount to facilitate the process and improve the properties of the film
Methodology: The current study aims at investigating the effect of cellulose, as an intensifier, and different ratio of glycerol/sorbitol, as an emollient, on the improvement of starch bio-composite. The optimum point for starch bio-composite is obtained by Design Expert Software and structural tests, TGA and XRD, were conducted on this point.
For this study, corn starch was purchased from Qazvin Glucose Company, microcrystalline cellulose (Avisel) from Chengdu (China) and glycerol, citric acid and stearic acid from Merck (Germany). Other materials used were prepared using laboratory grade. First, a suspension of cellulose and a certain amount of water were homogenized or subjected to ultrasound so that the starch could be well dispersed in the matrix. Raw material for the production of starch biocomposites, including corn starch (as a matrix), glycerol and sorbitol (as a softener and each from 10 to 20% by weight of starch), different amounts of cellulose fiber (from 0 to 20% by weight of starch), citric acid 1% by weight To improve the biocomposite, starch and stearic acid were physically mixed as a process aid (to prevent starch from adhering to equipment and 1% by weight of starch) (Landavi et al. 2015). The main mixing was done uniformly in the two-screw face extruder. The produced starch biocomposite or sheet was exposed to 50% relative humidity and 30°C for one week and then the necessary tests were performed on them. In the next step, the mold was used under pressure, until a starch sheet with a thickness of 1 mm was produced. The sheets were produced at a temperature of 160°C and a pressure of 25 MPa for 2 minutes. The temperature reached 50-40°C by the flow of cold water flowing around the mold and the pressure was removed. Then each sheet was qualified separately at 58% RH and 30°C and entered the test stage. The thickness of the film was measured randomly in 5 positions with the micrometer of incision (model W-3275-A, USA) with a resolution of 0.01 mm and their average was used for calculations.
In order to investigate the mechanical properties of nanocomposite films, mechanical properties including tensile stress, elongation at break (strain) and Young's modulus were calculated. Mechanical properties were determined at each rupture. Fracture stress and strain (σ, ε) were calculated for each sample. The film strips were cut to a length of 100 mm and a width of 20 mm and adjusted for 48 hours at a temperature of 23°C and a relative humidity of 53%. Tissue analysis performed by TA.XT plus histometer device made by Stable Microsystem of England and with Texture Expose 32 software was used to measure the mechanical properties of the film. Separation initial velocity and shear rate were 50 and 30 mm/ min, respectively. The elongation and tensile strength at the point of rupture were calculated from the deformation and the force of the data recorded by the software. 8 replicates of each sample were evaluated
Findings: optimum point was 5% cellulose and 17.5% of each emollient which has Water Vapor Permeability (WVP) as 7.81*10-10 gs-1m-1Pa-1, tensile strength of 0.85 MPa, Young module 277.56 MPa and elongation at break point 7.08%. The optimum glass transition temperature of bio-composite starch increases to 130o C. Although optimum bio-composite XRD show high picks demonstrating crystals, the findings from thermal weighting reveal that optimum bio-composite will be decomposed about 300. According to decomposition of natural starch at 220oC, this thermal resistance can be ascribed to the cellulose in its structure.
Final Findings: It is concluded that the composition of microcrystal cellulose and equal glycerol/sorbitol ratio lead to the development of starch bio-composite properties.
The aim of this study was to obtain a suitable combination of starch with cellulose (natural and degradable) and glycerol and sorbitol softeners that make starch similar to synthetic polymers with low water permeability and high mechanical strength. Be a good substitute for them. In this study, optimization of starch biocomposite formulation was performed by epithelial mixing method. The main purpose of optimization was to place the parameters of tensile strength, elongation and elastic modulus in the desired range and to minimize water vapor permeability. According to the modeling, the optimal treatment in the production of starch biocomposite was 5% cellulose, 17.5% glycerol and 17.5% sorbitol. The validation results of the answers showed that the results of the model have an acceptable similarity with the practical results. X-ray diffraction test to investigate the distribution of particles in the polymer matrix showed that the components of the composites are well dispersed. Behavioral patterns related to heat-weight changes of starch biocomposite showed that three main stages of degradation and weight loss were observed in starch biocomposites. The results of this study can open a new window towards the use of biodegradable packaging in the food industry to improve food quality and safety and reduce food waste. More research is needed to replace conventional plastics with green composites to at least protect human health and the environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • starch bio-composite
  • optimizing
  • Physical properties
  • cellulose
  • emollient
خزینی آ، طبرسا ت و شاکری ع. 1398. بهبود خواص فیزیکی و مکانیکی بیوکامپوزیت ساخته شده از نشاسته- پلی‌پروپیلن و الیاف سلولزی میکرو و نانو، پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشکده مهندسی چوب و کاغذ،  دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان.
رضائی ا ، رضائی م ، و آل بو فتیله می، 1400. تهیه فیلم کامپوزیت زیست تخریب‌پذیر کربوکسی متیل سلولز- صمغ عربی و ارزیابی خصوصیات فیزیکی، مکانیکی و حرارتی آن. نشریه پژوهش­های صنایع غذایی، 17(2)، 287-297.
Ahmed J, Tiwari B K, Imam S H and Rao M, 2012. Starch-based polymeric materials and nanocomposites: Chemistry, processing, and applications: CRC Press.
Avella M, De Vlieger J J, Errico M E, Fischer S, VaccaP and Volpe M G, 2005. Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chemistry 933: 467-474.
Baldwin E A, Hagenmaier R and Bai Jm 2011. Edible coatings and films to improve food quality: CRC Press.
Bourtoom T, 2008. Edible films and coatings: characteristics and properties. International Food Research Journal 153: 237-248.
Chiumarelli M and Hubinger M D, 2014. Evaluation of edible films and coatings formulated with cassava starch, glycerol, carnauba wax and stearic acid. Food hydrocolloids 38: 20-27.
García N L, Ribba L, Dufresne A, Aranguren M and Goyanes S, 2011. Effect of glycerol on the morphology of nanocomposites made from thermoplastic starch and starch nanocrystals. Carbohydrate polymers 841: 203-210.
Ghanbarzadeh B, Almasi H and Entezami A A, 2010. Physical properties of edible modified starch/carboxymethyl cellulose films. Innovative food science & emerging technologies 114: 697-702.
Ghanbarzadeh B, Almasi H and Entezami A A, 2011. Improving the barrier and mechanical properties of corn starch-based edible films: Effect of citric acid and carboxymethyl cellulose. Industrial crops and Products 331: 229-235.
Ghasemlou M and Khodaiyan Fand Oromiehie A, 2011. Physical, mechanical, barrier, and thermal properties of polyol-plasticized biodegradable edible film made from kefiran. Carbohydrate polymers 841: 477-483.
Hassan B, Chatha S A S, Hussain A I, Zia K M and Akhtar N, 2018. Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein based edible films and coatings: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 109: 1095-1107.
Janik H, Sienkiewicz M, Przybytek A, GuzmanA, Kucinska-Lipka J and Kosakowska A, 2018. Novel Biodegradable Potato Starch-based Compositions as Candidates in Packaging Industry, Safe for Marine Environment. Fibers and Polymers 196: 1166-1174.
Koch K, Gillgren T, Stading M and Andersson R, 2010. Mechanical and structural properties of solution-cast high-amylose maize starch films. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 461: 13-19.
Krogars K, Heinämäki J, Karjalainen M, Niskanen A, Leskelä M and Yliruusi J, 2003. Enhanced stability of rubbery amylose-rich maize starch films plasticized with a combination of sorbitol and glycerol. International journal of pharmaceutics 2511: 205-208.
Laohakunjit N and Noomhorm A, 2004. Effect of plasticizers on mechanical and barrier properties of rice starch film. Starch‐Stärke 568: 348-356.
Lee, Kwang Yeon, Jaeyong Shim, and Hyeon Gyu Lee. 2004. Mechanical properties of gellan and gelatin composite films. Carbohydrate Polymers 56: 251-254.
Mali S, Sakanaka L S, Yamashita F and Grossmann M, 2005. Water sorption and mechanical properties of cassava starch films and their relation to plasticizing effect. Carbohydrate polymers 603: 283-289.
Martins I M, Magina S P, Oliveira L, Freire S, Silvestre, A J, Neto C P and Gandini A, 2009. New biocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and bacterial cellulose. Composites Science and Technology 69: 2163-2168.
Parra D F, Tadini C. C, Ponce P and Lugão A. B, 2004. Mechanical properties and water vapor transmission in some blends of cassava starch edible films. Carbohydrate polymers 584: 475-481.
Rodríguez, Maria, Javier Oses, Khalid Ziani, and Juan I Mate, 2006. Combined effect of plasticizers and surfactants on the physical properties of starch based edible films. Food Research International 39 : 840-846.
Sanyang M, Sapuan S, Jawaid M, Ishak M and Sahari J, 2015. Effect of glycerol and sorbitol plasticizers on physical and thermal properties of sugar palm starch based films. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Environment, Ecosystems and Development.
Wilhelm H.-M, Sierakowski M.-R, Souza G and Wypych F, 2003. Starch films reinforced with mineral clay. Carbohydrate polymers 522: 101-110.
Wu Y, Weller C L, Hamouz F, Cuppett S L and Schnepf M, 2002. Development and application of multicomponent edible coatings and films: A review. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 44: 347-394.